“This wonderful book deserves widespread attention. It is a remarkable piece of work and one that is provocative in the best sense of the word.”—Laura Kalman, Distinguished Research Professor of History, UC Santa Barbara, author of FDR’s Gambit: The Court-Packing Fight and the Rise of Legal Liberalism
“Pushback offers a deep insight into the Supreme Court’s role in constructing, sustaining, and ultimately undermining the regimes students of American political development have identified. Dave Bridge argues that the Supreme Court often responds to signals from factions within a governing coalition, articulating the principles those factions believe characterize the regime they support. But, just as political time is only loosely connected to calendar time, so too is judicial time only loosely connected to political time. Sometimes Court decisions push the boundaries of a regime’s principles beyond the point where they are politically sustainable, thereby opening up the opportunity for the regime’s opponents—and potential successors—to make the Court’s decisions a focus of their campaigns: backlash, in short. Bridge applies his analysis to a range of contemporary constitutional issues, identifying those that are (and aren’t) good candidates for party-building pushback. Bridge’s provocative and important argument should become a major element in future scholarship on the Supreme Court and regime politics.”—Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law emeritus, Harvard Law School, coauthor of Constitutionalism and Its Discontents
“An important and insightful contribution to our understanding of the Supreme Court’s role in American politics. A substantively rich account of the Warren and Burger Courts, and a theoretically valuable analysis of how the least democratic branch of the federal government is made to feel popular pressures.”—Keith E. Whittington, Princeton University, author of Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present