front cover of
Ilya Somin
University of Chicago Press Journals
Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that seeks to provide a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad ranging and contributions employ explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design.
[more]

front cover of
Ilya Somin
University of Chicago Press Journals
Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that seeks to provide a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is wide-ranging, and contributions employ explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions and questions of judicial process and institutional design. 
[more]

front cover of
Ilya Somin
University of Chicago Press Journals

Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad-ranging and the contributions it brings together apply explicit or implicit economic reasoning to the analysis of legal issues before the court, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design.

[more]

front cover of
Ilya Somin
University of Chicago Press Journals

Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad-ranging and the contributions it brings together apply explicit or implicit economic reasoning to the analysis of legal issues before the court, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design.

[more]

front cover of
Ilya Somin
University of Chicago Press Journals
The Supreme Court Economic Review is an interdisciplinary journal that seeks to provide a forum for scholarship in law and economics, public choice, and constitutional political economy. Its approach is broad ranging, and contributions employ explicit or implicit economic reasoning for the analysis of legal issues, with special attention to Supreme Court decisions, judicial process, and institutional design. 
[more]

front cover of Osiris, Volume 35
Osiris, Volume 35
Food Matters: Critical Histories of Food and the Sciences
E. C. Spary
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2020
Since the early modern period, science has played an ever-growing role in healthcare, agriculture, the regulation of food and drink trades, and the standardization of nutrition guidelines. Yet until now, few studies had explored the historical processes through which scientific claims of knowledge gained the power to shape food supply chains and consumer choices. This volume of Osiris reveals how sciences of food have been informed by, and helped to shape in turn, an array of institutions, labor regimes, cultural practices, and ethical commitments.

The essays delve into a range of topics, from early modern dietetics and debates about cannibalism to modern ready-to-eat rations and Ayurvedic recipes, from analyses of hungry model organisms to the dining rituals of Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and their patrons. As Food Matters shows, the history of knowledge about food has always raised debates about the shifting definition and boundaries of expertise: between traditional recipes and experimental protocols; between domestic craft skill and laboratory procedure; between the management and redistribution of resources for the social body on the one hand, and the subjective experiences of individual bodies on the other. At a moment when the authority of science is being questioned by a variety of publics, Food Matters is a timely reminder that such tensions, always present in food-related domains, reflect broader historical developments through which science became a prevalent force in shaping all aspects of public and private life.
[more]

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2018
The Supreme Court Review, 2018
David A. Strauss
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2019
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
This year’s volume features prominent scholars assessing major legal events, including:
 
Mark Tushnet on President Trump’s “Muslim Ban”
Kate Andrias on Union Fees in the Public Sector
Cass R. Sunstein on Chevron without Chevron
Tracey Maclin on the Fourth Amendment and Unauthorized Drivers
Frederick Schauer on Precedent
Pamela Karlan on Gay Equality and Racial Equality
Randall Kennedy on Palmer v. Thompson
Lisa Marshall Manheim and Elizabeth G. Porter on Voter Suppression
Melissa Murray on Masterpiece Cakeshop
Vikram David Amar on Commandeering
Laura K. Donohue on Carpenter, Precedent, and Originalism
Evan Caminker on Carpenter and Stability 
[more]

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2019
The Supreme Court Review, 2019
David A. Strauss
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2020
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
 
This year’s volume features incisive assessments of major legal events, including:
 
Gillian E. Metzger on The Roberts Court's Administrative Law
Paul Butler on Peremptory Strikes in Mississippi v. Flowers
Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos on Partisan Gerrymandering
Kent Greenfield on Hate Speech
Jennifer M. Chacon on Department of Commerce v. New York
Micah Schwartzman & Nelson Tebbe on Establishment Clause Appeasement
William Baude on Precedent and Originalism
Linda Greenhouse on The Supreme Court’s Challenge to Civil Society
James T. Kloppenberg on James Madison
 
[more]

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2020
The Supreme Court Review, 2020
David A. Strauss
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2021

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.

This year’s volume features incisive assessments of major legal events, including:

Cristina M. Rodríguez on the Political Significance of Law
Martha Minow on Little Sisters of the Poor
Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule on the Unitary Executive
Cary Franklin on Living Textualism
David A. Strauss on Sexual Orientation and the Dynamics of Discrimination
Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash on the Executive’s Privileges and Immunities
Reva B. Siegel on Abortion Restrictions
Maggie Blackhawk on McGirt v. Oklahoma
Richard J. Lazarus on Advocacy History

[more]

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2021
The Supreme Court Review, 2021
David A. Strauss
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2022
The latest volume in the Supreme Court Review series.

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists. 
[more]

front cover of The Supreme Court Review, 2022
The Supreme Court Review, 2022
David A. Strauss
University of Chicago Press Journals, 2023
An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
[more]


Send via email Share on Facebook Share on Twitter