“A smart, insightful, supportive, straightforward, and engaging guide for anyone facing the prospect of change, career or otherwise. ‘So What Are You Going to Do with That?’ is one of the most important resources that I have, and I use it daily. This time, Basalla and Debelius dare to shed light on the science career myth that a career in academic science research is a panacea. The disconnect between a PhD student’s career intentions and the reality of the academic market behooves all science students to read this book and get involved more deeply in their career development and pathway options. I wish I had written it!”
— Victoria A. Blodgett, assistant dean, Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs, Graduate School, University of Connecticut
“Full of practical tips and anecdotes from people . . . who have turned academic study into fulfilling careers in everything from marketing to community building.”
— Christian Science Monitor
“Basalla and Debelius use wit, directness, and great anecdotal evidence to guide readers through the soul-searching decision to leave academia.”
— Publishers Weekly
“As valuable for its can-do spirit as its specific advice.”
— CNN.com
“[The authors] have filled this volume with insightful anecdotes, probing and worthwhile questions and a host of resources. . . for more specialized job searches. Basalla and Debelius illustrate just how skills acquired in graduate school research, teaching, and critical thinking . . . can be translated into desirable attributes of a post-academic job candidate. Hopeful, upbeat, and helpful.”
— Virginia Quarterly Review
“The reference tool for MAs and PhDs considering nonacademic career paths. The guide is comprehensive, hands-on, and much needed.”
— Elaine Showalter, professor emerita, Princeton University
“‘So What Are You Going to Do with That?’ is a life-changer for doctoral graduates and a godsend for the Republic. Basalla and Debulius show us how to engage the superb and transferable abilities of PhDs.”
— Robert Weisbuch, former president, Drew University
“I will absolutely be recommending this book to our graduate students exploring their career options—I’d love to see it on the coffee tables in department lounges!”
— Robin B. Wagner, former associate director of graduate career services, University of Chicago
“Fourteen years after they first published their guide on nonacademic career options for PhDs, . . . Basalla and Debelius are back with a third edition of that influential book.”
— Chronicle of Higher Education
“This third edition . . . is especially timely. Graduate students and current academicians are struggling, rather publicly, with the realization that a career in academics is no longer desired. . . . Basalla and Debelius have written a supportive, resourceful, and well-structured guide for the possibly long and windy journey ahead. . . . This is just the resource to help those in transition find more rewarding work that values and benefits from the academic experience.”
— Africa S. Hands, author of “Successfully Serving the College Bound”, San Francisco Book Review
“This is a book I wish I had written, because everything the authors advise is exactly the counsel that I give PhDs questioning, ‘Why did I do all this research if I can’t get an academic job?’ I find this book especially helpful for anyone just beginning to think about what a big deal it is to leave academe and those who are suffering ‘PhD identity crisis.’ (Remember, your degree is a credential—it doesn’t define your capabilities!).”
— Natalie Lundsteen, director of career development, Graduate School for Biomedical Sciences at UT Southwestern Medical Center, Inside Higher Ed
“And let’s not forget that PhDs looking for careers beyond academe must often overcome stereotypes associated with the three letters trailing their names. As Basalla and Debelius note, a common assumption is that ‘Academics can’t work in teams.’ Some of this caution is justified: graduate programs in the humanities have a tendency to incentivize specialization at the expense of collaboration. The more successful a student is, the more likely they are to conduct solitary research in a quiet laboratory or archive.”
— James M. Van Wyck, Inside Higher Ed