cover of book
 

Rationality of Irrationality: Political Determinants and Effects of Party Position Blurring
by Kyung Joon Han
University of Michigan Press, 2022
Cloth: 978-0-472-07553-9 | eISBN: 978-0-472-90291-0 | Paper: 978-0-472-05553-1
Library of Congress Classification JF2051
Dewey Decimal Classification 324.2

ABOUT THIS BOOK | AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY | REVIEWS | TOC | REQUEST ACCESSIBLE FILE
ABOUT THIS BOOK

Citizens in democracies complain that political parties’ positions on major issues are too ambiguous for them to confidently understand. Why is party position ambiguity so common? Are party positions ambiguous because political parties fail in forming clear policies or because they deliberately blur their positions? Rationality of Irrationality argues that political parties are motivated to strategically blur their position on an issue when they struggle with a certain disadvantage in the issue. Specifically, political parties present an ambiguous position when their own supporters are divided in their stances on the issue. A political party also blurs position stances when voters do not acknowledge that the party has the ability and integrity to solve problems related to the issue. Political parties blur their position in these cases because ambiguous party positions divert voters’ attention from the issue. Voters support a political party whose policy positions on major issues are close to their own stances. However, voters cannot confidently and exactly estimate party positions on an issue when they are only ambiguous.


Nearby on shelf for Political institutions and public administration / Public administration / Political parties: