The Substance of Shadow A Darkening Trope in Poetic History
by John Hollander, edited by Kenneth Gross
University of Chicago Press, 2016
Cloth: 978-0-226-35427-9 | Electronic: 978-0-226-35430-9
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226354309.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

John Hollander, poet and scholar, was a master whose work joined luminous learning and imaginative risk. This book, based on the unpublished Clark Lectures Hollander delivered in 1999 at Cambridge University, witnesses his power to shift the horizons of our thinking, as he traces the history of shadow in British and American poetry from the Renaissance to the end of the twentieth century.

Shadow shows itself here in myriad literary identities, revealing its force as a way of seeing and a form of knowing, as material for fable and parable. Taking up a vast range of texts—from the Bible, Dante, Shakespeare, and Milton to Poe, Dickinson, Eliot, and Stevens—Hollander describes how metaphors of shadow influence our ideas of dreaming, desire, doubt, and death. These shadows of poetry and prose fiction point to unknown, often fearful domains of human experience, showing us concealed shapes of truth and possibility. Crucially, Hollander explores how shadows in poetic history become things with a strange substance and life of their own: they acquire the power to console, haunt, stalk, wander, threaten, command, and destroy. Shadow speaks, even sings, revealing to us the lost as much as the hidden self.

An extraordinary blend of literary analysis and speculative thought, Hollander’s account of the substance of shadow lays bare the substance of poetry itself.   

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

John Hollander (1929–2013) was the Sterling Professor of English at Yale University and the author of more than thirty books of poetry and literary criticism. Kenneth Gross is the Alan F. Hilfiker Distinguished Professor of English at the University of Rochester. He is the author, most recently, of Puppet: An Essay on Uncanny Life, also published by the University of Chicago Press.

REVIEWS

“In The Substance of Shadow, Hollander traces the poetic life of shadows in the West from the Psalms and the Book of Job through Virgil, Dante, and on through a spectral company to T. S. Eliot and Hart Crane. This is a book of chiaroscuro imagination and erudition, a study of a tradition darkening as it increasingly uses a central image to reflect on the work of poetry, its powers of allusion, and figuration. I came away astonished at these new readings of classic works.”
— Rosanna Warren, author of Ghost in a Red Hat

“Who knows what shadows lurk in the hearts, and around the margins, and in the allusive connections of poems great and minor, English and American, classical and European? Nobody knew as much, perhaps, as John Hollander, who explored the binaries, the dualities, the implications of literary shadows in these splendid, memorable lectures, tracing the shadow as topos and trope over centuries. This is a carefully salvaged and pellucid text from the poet, critic, and scholar who taught so many of us so much.”
— Stephanie Burt, Harvard University

“Though we don’t often notice it, shadow is everywhere in our lives and in the world, and almost as ubiquitous in literature. The late John Hollander, a poet and critic of dazzling inventiveness and erudition, focuses a brilliant spotlight on this element of darkness that lies so close to otherwise sunlit surfaces. Kenneth Gross is to be congratulated for assembling Hollander’s Clark Lectures at Cambridge into a whole. As Gross says, ‘the book can suggest an anatomy of melancholy . . . but shadow here is also an occasion of continuous wonder and opening to the gifts of time.’”
— John Ashbery, author of Notes from the Air

“The late John Hollander was an immensely erudite poet-critic whose acute scholarship illuminated the nature of Western poetry and its history. His masterwork The Substance of Shadow completes his life’s work of tracing the images and metaphors of the imagination. Sixty years of conversation with him flood back upon me as I follow his guidance in pursuing poems that are a Great Shadow’s last embellishments.”
— Harold Bloom, Yale University

“Gross has done an excellent job. . . . The learned and diverting book he has produced is a great pleasure, as brilliant in the small scale as it is suggestive in its broad sweep. . . . ‘Shadows are metaphors too imaginatively substantial for abstract discourse, and they get out of hand,’ [Hollander] says at one point. The Substance of Shadow demonstrates the immense poetic advantages that may be won from apprehending their uncertain life.”
— Times Literary Supplement

“In his characteristically brilliant way, Hollander shows that reading historically is as much about the parallax view as the teleological mechanism. . .his lucidity is a model for those who might yet track the shadows cast beyond the purview of his lectures: those hovering over, within, and between the fractured domains of contemporary poetry.”
— Jacket2

“In the wake of his death, Kenneth Gross carefully edited the lectures. . .incorporating some revisions Hollander had indicated and including other notes and additional passages in an appendix in the back. I say ‘carefully’ to indicate precision, certainly, but more so to indicate the attention that affection affords and which Gross exemplifies in his shepherding of this posthumous work. Nowhere is this more evident than in the stellar introduction, which well-nigh rivals Hollander’s own prose for its elegance and insight. . most invigorating in Hollander’s account is a reminder that shadows offer us exquisite figures for the patient making that is poetry.”
— The Spenser Review

TABLE OF CONTENTS


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226354309.003.0000
[shadow, shade, substance, manuscript, author, revision]
The preface by this book’s editor, Kenneth Gross, in addition to summarizing the general argument, reflects briefly on how the subject of shadow relates to the author’s earlier literary criticism as well as to the corpus of his poetry. It also describes the shape of the manuscript of the Clark Lectures, on which this book his based, the traces in that manuscript of the author’s own work of revision, and the nature of the editorial work involved in preparing the manuscript for publication.

- John Hollander, Kenneth Gross
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226354309.003.0001
[shadow, substance, image, love, dream, illusion, darkness, Donne, Shakespeare, Campion]
This chapter examines how shadow in English Renaissance poetry becomes an image of our desires, dreams, and fears, in all their power and uncertainty. He begins with John Donne’s “A Lecture upon the Shadow” and goes on to discuss other love poems, including a group of Shakespeare’s sonnets—with their eerie self-reflections (“millions of strange shadows”) and increasing darkness of desire—as well as lesser-known poems by Thomas Campion, George Chapman, and Samuel Daniel. It discusses how shadows help Renaissance poets explore and map unknown, wished-for worlds, often playing against Plato’s dualism by aligning earthly shadows more closely with their supposed opposite, the realm of things Ideal. (pages 1 - 32)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- John Hollander, Kenneth Gross
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226354309.003.0002
[shadow, shade, ghost, death, Bible, typology, Virgil, Dante, Milton]
This chapter explores the earlier history of poetic shadow, its biblical and classical, especially Virgilian, roots. It focuses on the relation between images of shadow as, first, a figure of protection (the covering shadow of divine wings, Isaiah’s “the shadow of a great rock in a weary land,” or the restful shade of a pastoral tree); and, second, a figure of death and loss, defining a realm that Psalm 23 calls “the valley of the shadow,” shade and shadow lending form to ghosts. Later evolutions of these two aspects of shadow and their way of playing off one another are then taken up: the varied, often uncanny ombre of Dante’s Divina Commedia become important here, and even more so those of Milton in Paradise Lost, including the “darkness visible” of Hell, the shadow of Heaven, and those corporeal and incorporeal shadows that populate Eden before and after the fall. (pages 33 - 68)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...


DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226354309.003.0003
[shadow, mind, double, self, illusion, romanticism, Blake, Shelley, Hogg, Andersen]
This chapter 3 moves into the poetry of Romanticism, examining the ways in which the shadow comes to be seen as an image or expression of an unseen self, material for evermore acute psychological maps. The shadow here evokes a hidden, unknown, or alien selfhood, something linked to memories of childhood, as well as to more dangerous, even self-destructive, impulses, or to the internalized shadows of social repression. One focus here is the complexly personified shadows that emerge in the mythic poems of William Blake, shadows that are brooding, mournful, jealous, usurping, wandering. The chapter also focuses on the myriad forms of shadow in Percy Bysshe Shelley’s poetry, shadows of volatile and unknown powers, charming, transformative, and devouring things that the poet urgently wants to know and name. This lecture looks as well at uncanny tales of a shadow that takes on a life of its own, becoming a double or treacherous doppelgänger, most prominently in works by E. T. A. Hoffmann, James Hogg, and Hans Christian Andersen.
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- John Hollander, Kenneth Gross
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226354309.003.0004
[shadow, substance, doubt, crisis, allusion, memory, modernity, Poe, Tennyson, Eliot]
This chapter rounds out the history that is unfolded in the first three chapters, looking closely at the peculiarly fraught, crisis-laden shadows of later romantic and modern poetry. The focus is on texts by Edgar Allan Poe, Alfred Lord Tennyson, and T. S. Eliot. Poetic shadow here offers a dark witness of unknown realms of experience and existence, opening up more extreme spaces of doubt and uncertainty. It sums up and intermingles representations of things seen and unseen, and even unseeable, expressions of inner states and outer conditions. This chapter highlights, among other things, the densely allusive nature of shadow in these texts, and meditates on the ways in which the substance of modern poetic shadow is, to a large degree, that of prior poetic shadow itself. (pages 101 - 130)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

-
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226354309.003.0005
[shadow, substance, doubt, memory, painting, Rilke, Lawrence, Thoreau]
This final section of the book gathers together a group of notes and addenda that are included in the manuscript of the lectures on which the first four chapters are based. These notes reflect the author’s never-completed work in revising these lectures for a book. The fragments include discussions of a wide-range of examples not included in the lectures proper, for example, texts by Petrarch, John Bunyan, Fulke Greville, Thomas Hood, Henry David Thoreau, George Macdonald, Rainer Maria Rilke, D. H. Lawrence, and Isaac Rosenberg. It also includes reflections on shadow in painting, on the idea of the double, and on the history of the phrase “the shadow of a doubt.” (pages 131 - 154)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...